jpost: BELGIUM ARRESTS NE0-NAZIS IN THEIR ARMED FORCES

Many of those arrested were soldiers, and some were “people with an extreme-right ideology who clearly express themselves through racism, xenophobia, Holocaust denial, anti-Semitism and neo-Nazism,” the federal prosecutor’s office said in a statement.

The arrests came after a two-year investigation by authorities into extreme right elements in the army. Raids of army barracks and private homes uncovered explosives, weapons and ultra-right propaganda.

“There was no evidence of an imminent attack,” Belgium’s federal prosecutor said, “but from the documents the authorities seized it was clear that the group wanted to attack the structure and institutions of the state”.

“We found an enormous amount of ammunition. All manner of weapons from hunting rifles to military guns, detonators and above all extreme right and even neo-nazi propaganda,” the prosecutor added.

Police said the suspects may have been members of the Flanders branch of the international neo-Nazi network “Blood and Honor,” and said the raids foiled a violent plot that was in the making. The ringleader, a soldier, is thought to have been planning to move the plot into action.


From Haaretz: Their Private Holocaust

By Ronit Roccas

Yoram Mor was 9 years old (his name was Jerzy Mieczyk then) when the Germans invaded Poland. Four years later, at the end of 1943, his family - his father, his mother, he and his sister - found shelter in the home of a Polish family that lived in a village near Warsaw. Mor already knew then that the shelter was given to them not only in return for money, but also thanks to the affair that the woman had conducted with his father. “I knew when my father got out of bed and went to the Polish woman,” relates Mor in “Quilt of Time” by Hanna Ezer-Ulitzky , which was published by Gvanim with the help of Yad Vashem and the Amos Fund of the President’s House. “This was part of the price we paid for staying there.”

However, some time later, the father was murdered by the Germans and the woman who was hiding them demanded they leave. Mor was already 14, his sister Joanna was only 7 and their mother realized there was no way of keeping them together and alive. She decided to send her son to work for a Polish farmer, but first she asked him to take his sister and leave her in the street; perhaps someone would take pity on the orphan, who had a crucifix placed around her neck, and take her in.

MORE.


Jewish Week: Berlin Museum Copes with Holocaust Remembrance

New Museum Strives To Deal With Holocaust Liel Leibovitz - Staff Writer
Berlin — More than any of its contents, perhaps, it is the building itself of the German Historical Museum that best narrates Germany’s tumultuous history.

Built in glorious Baroque fashion in 1730, the building, named the Zeughaus, or armory, served precisely that purpose for more than a century. It is from here, then, that weapons were dispatched for the Napoleonic wars, to continental skirmishes and local uprisings. Converted into a military museum by Emperor Wilhelm I in 1880, it was one of Hitler’s favorite monuments; Nazi parades, commemorations and ceremonies were held in the building’s courtyard until 1944. Severely damaged by the Allies’ bombs in 1945, the building was once again reconstructed as a museum after the war, reopening in 1952 under the management of East Germany’s Socialist Unity Party, who turned it into a museum for interpreting history from a Marxist-Leninist perspective.

Last month, following more than two decades of curatorial work, the museum was reopened once again, this time as an expansive effort to shed light on Germany’s history, from the first century to the present. Displaying more than 8,000 objects — from Roman-period coins to a Trabant, the notorious inexpensive East German car — the museum offers an integrated approach to history, allowing visitors to look at periodic artifacts before luring them away to computer screens or texts that provide detailed information, accompanied by multimedia, about each specific subject.

And while the museum’s second floor, where the permanent exhibition begins, covers nearly two millennia of war, peace and progress, the first floor is dedicated to the 80 or so years between 1921 and the present.

The discrepancy between distant and near past, said Dr. Rudolf Trabold, the museum’s chief press officer, is partly a matter of convenience. “It is like a tree,� he said, “you see the nearest branches first. There are also more artifacts from that period, and people are more interested in it.�

But ultimately, he said, it was the momentousness of the decade between 1933 and 1945 that convinced the museum’s heads to award it so much space.

“We had a very hard time when it came to how to represent the Holocaust,� said Trabold. Some officials, he said, suggested that the museum not sway from its regular course, and deal with the genocide of the Jews by presenting artifacts accompanied by text and interpretation. Others, however, thought the straightforward approach would fail to capture the enormity of the massacre.

“How can you explain to someone what six million people means?� asked Trabold. “How can you even explain six thousand? Some people, therefore, thought that the best way would be to have a dark, black room with nothing in it.�

This metaphorical approach, he added, was struck down as well, deemed too simplistic. Finally, the museum obtained one of Mieczyslaw Stobierski’s models of Auschwitz (the others are in Yad Vashem in Jerusalem and the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C.), making it the center piece of an extensive collection of documents, photographs, objects and texts pertaining to this darkest of periods. Here, for example, one can see Nazi propaganda films and candid snapshots from Jewish ghettos as well as concrete artifacts such as Adolf Hitler’s desk or the giant globe at the center of the most memorable scene of Charlie Chaplin’s “The Great Dictator.�

“Notice how even the color of the wall changes,� said Trabold. “We move from the light yellow of the 18th and 19th centuries to the lifeless gray of 1933 onwards.�

The story of the Jews in Germany, however, does not, of course, begin in 1933, nor does it end in 1945. The museum acknowledges this. Throughout the timeline of the main exhibition are strewn occasional references to the country’s Jews: Here they are in the 14th century, falsely accused of poisoning the wells during the Black Plague, and there again four hundred years later, when, following Moses Mendelssohn, they marched into emancipation.

To render the experience more personal, the museum’s ample interactive monitors allow visitors to follow the fate of the Chotzen family, a prominent Jewish family from Berlin, from 1914 to 2004. Here, family photographs and mementos are presented side by side with a historical timeline, rendering the Chotzen’s tragedy a kaleidoscope through which to observe the history of both Germany and its Jewish citizens.

But most fascinating, perhaps, are the references to the Holocaust after the war. In a section titled “Schuld Der Vater,� or guilt of the fathers, a text on the wall reads: “Shortly before the [Frankfurt Auschwitz trials of 1963] began, an opinion poll indicated that 54 percent of those asked wanted to consider the thing finished and not to bother the perpetrators anymore for such a long time. The trial, lasting over 20 months, changed public opinion.� Similarly, the exhibit includes a lengthy discussion of “Holocaust,� the 1978 American television mini-series that helped spark a major discussion of the topic among third-generation Germans, as well as Chancellor Richard von Weizsacker’s historic 1985 speech, the first official call by a government official to commemorate the Holocaust’s victims.

It is such candor and thoroughness that make the museum particularly appealing to the Jewish visitor. And while the Holocaust-related artifacts are, for the most parts, not different than what one would find in any Holocaust museum around the world, here they are presented not in the stand-alone context of the persecution and extermination of Jews, but rather as a strand woven into the larger quilt of German history.

This allows the visitor a rare opportunity to study both the deepest roots of the Jewish catastrophe — ancient anti-Semitism, for example, as well as the abysmal conditions of post-World War I Germany — and its aftermath. Put together, the exhibition tells a complex story, one with many bleak passages but also plenty of hope, the hope that comes from historical study, analysis and introspection.

“That’s the wonderful thing about this museum,� said Trabold. “Here, one and one never equals two.� n

The German Historical Museum (Deutsches Historisches Museum) is located at Unter Den Linden 2, Berlin, +49 - (0)30 - 20304 – 444.


Danes Publish Iranian Hate and Holocaust Cartoons

Copenhagen - A Danish newspaper published Friday some of the controversial cartoons recently exhibited in Iran that satirized the Holocaust, saying the move was necessary since the exhibition had its roots in Denmark.

The exhibition in Tehran was organized in the wake of massive protests in the Muslim world earlier this year sparked by Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten’s decision to publish caricatures of the Prophet Mohammed, the left-liberal daily Information said.

An editorial in Information said the Iranian exhibition was a reaction to the Jyllands-Posten publication, and later in other European newspapers, adding that it felt it was ‘obliged to document developments in a matter that originated in Denmark.’

Denmark’s Chief Rabbi Bent Lexner was quoted as saying that he did not see a problem with Information’s publication.

‘The cartoons are unpleasant, but they are not new. The Arab world has always used that kind of cartoon,’ Lexner said.

The Iranian exhibition has been criticized internationally, as has President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s comments that the Holocaust was a ‘myth.’

© 2006 dpa - Deutsche Presse-Agentur

The exhibition in Tehran was organized in the wake of massive protests in the Muslim world earlier this year sparked by Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten’s decision to publish caricatures of the Prophet Mohammed, the left-liberal daily Information said.

An editorial in Information said the Iranian exhibition was a reaction to the Jyllands-Posten publication, and later in other European newspapers, adding that it felt it was ‘obliged to document developments in a matter that originated in Denmark.’

Denmark’s Chief Rabbi Bent Lexner was quoted as saying that he did not see a problem with Information’s publication.

‘The cartoons are unpleasant, but they are not new. The Arab world has always used that kind of cartoon,’ Lexner said.

The Iranian exhibition has been criticized internationally, as has President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s comments that the Holocaust was a ‘myth.’

© 2006 dpa - Deutsche Presse-Agentur